CLAT 2025: Delhi High Court Refuses To Stay Order Revising Results

A 17 year old candidate Aditya Singh filed the plea in the High Court and challenged the CLAT graduate exam answer key.

Delhi High Court Edited by
CLAT 2025: Delhi High Court Refuses To Stay Order Revising Results

CLAT 2025: Delhi High Court Refuses To Stay Order Revising Results

The Delhi High Court devision bench has refused to stay an order of the single judge bench directing the Consortium of National Law Universities to announce revised results of the Common Law Admission Test (CLAT) 2025 undergraduate exam after changing the marks for two questions. The matter was heard by acting Chief Justice Vibhu Bakhru and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela.

While hearing the plea the bench said that there is no error in the single judge’s decision of finding the two answers as ‘demonstrably wrong’. The bench said that single judge has examined the two questions carefully and has found that a different view is not a plausible one. Prime facie, the bench agreed with the single judge.

Directing the Cosortium of National Law Universities (NLU) the bench said, “You can go ahead with the results. There is no interim order passed in that. We clarify that there is no stay order & pendency of this petition is not construed as placing a cloud on the results, which may be reworked as per the single judge order”.

Read also: Supreme Court Stays Kerala High Court’s ‘Impractical’ Elephant Guidelines For Thrissur Pooram

On December 20, the Delhi High Court directed the CLNU to announce revised results of for CLAT 2025 undergraduate exam after considering the two objectionable questions. Justice Jyoti Singh ordered Consortium to rectify errors in two questions, 14 and 100 of Set A, stating that the mistakes were demonstrably clear. The court said that ignoring these errors would cause injustice to the candidates.

The single bench judge instructed to award marks to all candidates who selected option C for question 14 in Set A and to remove question 100 from the evaluation.

Reportedly, a 17 year old candidate Aditya Singh filed the plea in the High Court and challenged the CLAT graduate exam answer key, arguing that errors in the answer key had adverse impact on the rank of the candidates.

Read also: Foreign Law Graduates Not Required To Clear Other Qualifying Exams Except AIBE: Karnataka High Court