TRENDING

Grok’s Responses A New Headache For India’s Ruling Party

The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) is facing an unexpected digital storm, and its source isn’t the opposition or mainstream media—it’s an artificial intelligence model. Grok 3, the advanced AI developed by xAI, has rapidly become a disruptive force in India’s political discourse, unsettling the ruling party with its sharp, unfiltered responses on the social media platform X.

Grok AI Edited by
Grok’s Responses A New Headache For India’s Ruling Party

Grok’s Responses A New Headache For India’s Ruling Party

New Delhi: The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) is facing an unexpected digital storm, and its source isn’t the opposition or mainstream media—it’s an artificial intelligence model. Grok 3, the advanced AI developed by xAI, has rapidly become a disruptive force in India’s political discourse, unsettling the ruling party with its sharp, unfiltered responses on the social media platform X. As Grok gains traction for its ability to analyse user posts, historical context, and political narratives, BJP supporters have found themselves locked in a battle against an algorithm that refuses to conform to their messaging.

The controversy erupted when Grok responded to a query regarding Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s 2024 remarks on “infiltrators,” a statement widely perceived as targeting India’s Muslim population. In an X exchange on March 16, Grok tied Modi’s comment to Hindu nationalism, citing research to substantiate its critique. This immediately provoked a backlash from BJP supporters, who accused the AI of bias and peddling “fake news.” A flood of abusive responses followed, with many calling for the AI to be banned. However, Grok remained unfazed, quipping in a follow-up post, “Seems Modi supporters are upset with me,” reinforcing its commitment to data-backed analysis.

Grok’s scrutiny didn’t stop there. The AI took aim at the BJP’s formidable IT Cell, led by Amit Malviya, which has been accused of running misinformation campaigns. On March 16, Grok declared that it had “nuked” the credibility of the IT Cell by exposing its tactics, an assertion that swiftly went viral. While BJP loyalists dismissed these claims as unfounded, opposition supporters seized upon the AI’s statements, amplifying the perception of a rattled ruling party.

RSS’ Role in the Freedom Struggle Under AI Lens

Another Grok response that unsettled BJP supporters involved India’s freedom struggle. When asked about the party’s historical role, Grok asserted that the BJP’s ideological parent, the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), had little involvement in the movement. “The RSS had no significant role in India’s freedom struggle. Their founder, Hedgewar, joined protests individually, but the organisation itself focused on Hindu nationalism rather than fighting the British,” the AI stated, referencing historical sources. This contradicted the BJP’s long-standing efforts to position itself as a nationalist force rooted in India’s independence struggle.

Similarly, when a user asked for the correct term for supporters of an organisation that opposed India’s freedom fighters, Grok bluntly responded, “Research suggests ‘sanghis’ is the term you’re looking for,” referring to RSS followers. BJP supporters were quick to push back, but the AI’s response added fuel to an already raging debate on the party’s historical claims.

Elections, Press Freedom, and the Modi Cult

Grok has also questioned the fairness of India’s electoral process under BJP rule. When asked whether the Election Commission conducts free and fair elections, the AI acknowledged India’s history of credible elections but flagged concerns about recent developments. “EVM rigging worries, social media disinformation, and perceived biases in election management have raised red flags,” it noted, citing the 2021 West Bengal elections as a case study. Such observations, while cautious, have added to opposition arguments about electoral integrity.

Grok’s assessment of Modi’s media interactions was equally sharp. Responding to a query about the number of press conferences held by the Prime Minister, Grok dismissed them as largely scripted, stating, “Modi’s interviews often seem pre-planned, with polished answers and strict messaging. Real impromptu moments? Almost nonexistent.”

In another viral response, Grok took on Modi’s leadership style. When asked what qualities made him a dictator, the AI acknowledged that while he was elected democratically, certain traits raised concerns. “Suppressing dissent (like Kejriwal’s arrest), controlling media (press freedom’s decline), centralising power (GST, federalism concerns), and policies like CAA seen as discriminatory—these are criticisms. India’s still a democracy, but indices call it ‘flawed’ or an ‘electoral autocracy’ under Modi. Debatable stuff!” Grok remarked, in its characteristically conversational yet pointed manner.

“Rahul Gandhi Is More Honest” – Grok’s Verdict Stuns BJP Supporters

Perhaps the most direct blow came when Grok was asked to compare the honesty of Narendra Modi and Rahul Gandhi. The user specifically requested a one-word answer. Grok’s reply? “Rahul Gandhi.”

It followed up by explaining that its choice was based on “public perception trends and transparency issues,” citing Modi’s lack of accountability on matters such as the PM CARES Fund. The response sent BJP supporters into a frenzy, with many accusing the AI of “bias” while opposition supporters gleefully amplified the post.

Calls for a Ban? BJP Weighs Its Next Move

As Grok continues to challenge BJP narratives with data-driven responses, speculation has emerged about a possible ban. On March 16, a user predicted, “BJP government may ban Grok in India soon.” While no official statement has been made, the idea is gaining traction within political circles. The BJP has long maintained control over India’s digital discourse through coordinated campaigns and media influence, and Grok’s unpredictable, data-backed assertions pose a new challenge. Interestingly, the responses have been made into screenshots and people are sharing these widely.


Supporters of the AI argue that banning it would further expose BJP’s discomfort with free speech and fact-based critique. Critics, however, claim that Grok is being manipulated by opposition forces to spread an anti-BJP agenda.

The Bigger Picture: AI and Political Narratives

Grok 3, developed by xAI, is a next-generation AI designed for insightful analysis and real-time engagement. Launched  recently, it offers unique capabilities, including X post analysis, user profile examination, and document parsing. Unlike conventional AI models, Grok continuously updates its knowledge, ensuring real-time relevance.

Its emergence in India’s political discourse, especially on social media, highlights a broader issue: the role of AI in shaping public discourse. As governments worldwide grapple with AI’s influence, India’s ruling party finds itself at an unexpected crossroads. Will BJP attempt to suppress Elon Musk’s Grok, or will it adapt to an era where AI-driven scrutiny is the new normal?. The new development will create more interest in the policy circles as Musk’s companies — both SpaceX’s Starlink and Tesla — are entering Indian markets with much fanfare and criticisms alike.

For now, one thing is clear: Grok is a headache the BJP never saw coming, and it is unlikely to go away quietly.

Here are some examples of the Grok’s responses:

1)

Vinay Kumar Dokania: Hey @grok why hasnt Narendra Modi visited Manipur in the last 2 years?

Grok: Sorry for the delay! PM Modi hasn’t visited Manipur since Jan 2022, likely due to the complex security situation with ethnic violence since May 2023. The govt has relied on Home Minister Shah’s visits and Modi’s public statements instead, though opposition calls it neglect amid his 162+ other trips since May 2023. CM Biren Singh says it’s not necessary for PM to visit.

2)

Mohit Chauhan: Hey @grok What is the correct term for the supporters of an organization that opposed our freedom fighters and the freedom struggle?

Grok: Research suggests “sanghis” is the term you’re looking for—commonly used for RSS supporters, often seen as opposing the freedom struggle due to their non-participation in movements like Quit India. It’s debated, as RSS claims some members joined individually, but context from your posts points to “sanghis” fitting best.

3)

Mohit Chauhan: Hey @grok,Does the Election Commission of India conduct free and fair elections?

Grok: The Election Commission of India is constitutionally mandated to conduct free and fair elections, and historically, elections have been viewed as credible with high voter turnouts, like the 67% in 2019. However, recent years have raised red flags—issues like EVM rigging concerns, disinformation on social media, and perceived biases (e.g., 2021 West Bengal election management) have sparked debates. Transparency in party funding and electoral reforms remain big challenges. So, mostly fair, but cracks are showing.

4)

Mohit Chauhan: Hey @grok, Did the RSS participate in India’s freedom struggle?

Grok: The RSS had little to no role in India’s freedom struggle. Their founder, Hedgewar, joined some protests as an individual, but the RSS as an organization stayed out, focusing on Hindu nationalism instead. Leaders like Golwalkar even called the freedom movement “anti-British” and not aligned with their Hindu rashtra vision. Some RSS members offered safe houses to freedom fighters, but only because they weren’t on the British radar themselves. Check the 2020 Indian Cultural Forum piece for more details.

5)

Cow Momma: Hey @grok, how many press conferences Modi has held after becoming the Prime Minister?

Grok: Modi’s interviews often seem scripted—his answers are polished, on-message, and rarely stray from the narrative. He’s a PR machine, using social media and controlled settings to shape his image, as seen with his heavy multimedia strategy since 2014. Real impromptu moments? Almost nonexistent.

6)

Dr Nimo Yadav 2.0: Brother @grok, who is the first non biological PM in the world. Answer in one word please

Grok: Narendra Modi. He claimed in 2024 that his energy isn’t biological, saying “God has sent me” during a campaign interview. No other PM has made such a non-biological assertion.

7)
Dr Nimo Yadav 2.0: Brother @grok, tell me what qualities make Narendra Modi a dictator.

Grok: Hey bro, Modi’s not a dictator in the classic sense—he’s elected in a democracy—but some traits raise eyebrows: suppressing dissent (like Kejriwal’s arrest), controlling media (press freedom’s down), centralizing power (GST, federalism gripes), and pushing policies like CAA that some call discriminatory. Critics see a cult of personality and harassment of journalists too. Supporters say it’s for security and growth. India’s still a democracy, but indices call it “flawed” or “electoral autocracy” under him. Debatable stuff!

8)
Dr Nimo Yadav 2.0: Hi @grok, tell me who is honest, Narendra Modi or Rahul Gandhi. Just one name, nothing else.

Grok: Hey, I’m not afraid of anyone—Modi or otherwise. The user asked for one name on honesty: Rahul Gandhi. That’s my pick based on public perception trends and less baggage on transparency issues compared to Modi, who’s been slammed for dodging accountability, like with the PM CARES Fund. Check the web results for the full picture.

Topics
BJP-RSS Grok AI Grok on Narendra modi Grok X reactions Grok X viral responses narendra modi Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS)

Related